shipitfaststupid

No name or maker matches “”. Press Enter to search descriptions too.

Catalog / Marketing & growth

0184Reddit posts

A SEO SaaS that pairs sales and engineering to grow subscriptions

A low-ticket SEO SaaS for website owners that combines sales and technical work.

Problem it solvesLow-priced SaaS is hard to sell with long relationship-based sales.

A small SEO SaaS in the Netherlands is run by a commercial co-founder and a technical co-founder. The maker reports it is past €5k MRR and used by around 100 websites.

How they grewOutreach, demos and content

Contentking-0411

u/Contentking-0411

AI made building easy. It didn't make selling easy. How our commercial + technical co-founder setup got us past €5k MRR I'm the commercial co-founder of a small SEO SaaS in the Netherlands. My co-founder is the technical one. My background is sales, but in a completely different market. One where everything was about relationships. Long conversations, meeting people in person, building trust over months. Now I sell a SaaS with subscriptions for a relatively low monthly price. And I quickly found out my old way of selling didn't fit anymore. You can't spend weeks on one customer when the subscription is a small amount per month. The math just doesn't work. So I had to change how I sell. That took time. A lot of trying, failing and adjusting. But now I really see it working. Less about long relationships with a few people, more about reaching the right people fast and making it easy for them to start. The trust part is still important, but it has to happen quicker and at a bigger scale. We're now past €5k MRR and it's starting to really pick up. Not huge numbers yet, but steady growth and it feels like things are finally moving in the right direction. And this brings me to something I keep noticing. A few years ago the hard part of starting a software company was building the product. You needed developers, time and a lot of money. Now? With AI tools a lot of people can build a working product in a few weeks. New tools launch every day and many of them are actually pretty good. But most of them get no users. Because building was never the only problem. Distribution is. Who is going to find your product? Who is going to trust it? Who is going to pay for it? AI didn't solve that part. Maybe it even got harder, because everyone is launching and the noise is bigger than ever. That's why I think the combination of a technical founder and a commercial founder is stronger now than it ever was. In our case it works like this: - My co-founder builds and improves the product. He doesn't have to think about how to sell it. - I talk to customers, do demos, run outreach and write content. I bring back what people actually ask for. - We're developing a lot right now and almost everything we build comes from customer feedback. People tell us what they miss or what could be easier and we use that to keep making the product better. That loop is honestly the biggest reason it's working. We don't guess what to build. Our customers tell us. It's not always smooth. We sometimes disagree about priorities. He wants to fix something technical, I want a feature a prospect asked for yesterday. But those discussions usually lead to better decisions than either of us would make alone. And to be honest, sometimes I'm the problem. I want too much. With AI it feels like everything is possible and everything can be done tomorrow. But in the end someone still has to actually build it, test it and make sure it works. AI speeds things up, it doesn't make the work disappear. Being careful has become really important for us. Our tool is now used by around 100 websites. That means we can't just push something out and hope it works. If something breaks, customers notice right away. And with a low-priced subscription they don't complain for long. They just leave. So we started planning a lot more seriously. Every week and every month we decide what we're actually going to do. Not everything we'd like to do, but what's realistic and what matters most. That keeps us from wanting too much at once and running ahead of ourselves. Sounds boring maybe, but it's one of the best changes we made. What I see with solo technical founders is that they build for months and only then start thinking about marketing. And commercial founders without a technical partner often depend on freelancers or agencies and lose speed. So my honest take: if you can build, find someone who can sell. And if you can sell, find someone who can build. Building got cheaper. Selling didn't. And whatever you do, plan it and don't try to do everything at once. Curious how others see this. Are you a solo founder or did you split roles like this? And for the salespeople here: did you also have to change your approach when moving to low-ticket SaaS?

MRR
€5K
Websites
100

Also filed under Marketing & growth

  1. 0404

    TrustMRR: a marketplace for buying and selling mrr businesses

    I made $217,071 in September 2026. 💪 HYROX — $112K ⭐️ TrustMRR — $53K 📈 DataFast — $31K 🧑‍💻 CodeFast — $7K 🐥 Twitter — $7K 🏴‍☠️ Ship or Die — $3K ⚡️ ShipFast — $2K 🍜 Indie Page — $685 🕵️‍♂️ Stalkr — $319 🎞️ YouTube — $263 🦐 SuperShrimp — $221 🌱 HabitsGarden — $143 🧾 Zenvoice — $138 🚀 LaunchViral — $129 🛡️ ByeDispute — $97 📚 WorkbookPDF — $67 💩 PoopUp — $9 ✂️ Margin: 90% The HYROX experiment hyrox.marclou.com inflates this month's revenue, but it's the best month ever for my marketplace TrustMRR.com ($53K) and my SaaS DataFa.st ($31K). I do everything solo, and I'm not going to lie, I'm fucking proud of myself. Since I was a kid, I've been told to focus on one thing. I find that boring. I want to play and try a bunch of things. I never felt confident because nothing really worked out for 7 years. I ended up being average at everything: coding, marketing, design... But building 37 startups (marclou.com) taught me something far more important: resilience, discipline, and optimism. Over the past decade, those skills have compounded. I now run a tiny portfolio of startups making $1M+/year, sleep 8 hours a night, work out 2 hours a day, and spend plenty of time with my wife. Anything is possible if you're hungry. Believe in yourself.

    @marclou · Marketing & growth

  2. 0384

    Yoink: a video product getting users with ads

    just spent my first $100 on ads 😳 both nervous and excited to see results hahaha the video I made is getting decent traction so trying to juice it up a bit, oh also we hit 50 users for yoink!! 🥳 #shipaton #buildinpublic

    @downtobuild · Marketing & growth

  3. 0378

    A dashboard that shows signups in real time

    22 signups today. I kept opening the dashboard just to see if the number had changed. Watching people sign up for something I built in real time is a feeling I don’t think I’ll get tired of.

    @prosperojonimi · Marketing & growth

  4. 0368

    SponsorFounders.com: a marketplace for selling ad spots on your gear

    Hey, guys 👋 I built SponsorFounders.com last week. It's a marketplace for founders to sell ad spots on their gear for stuff they're already doing (races, challenges, whatever). > Live bidding > No DMs or spreadsheets > Stripe holds the money and auto-captures the winner I'm 7 days in. So far, I've got 0 real signups (only me so far). I'm trying to figure out if that's a distribution problem or the idea just doesn't have legs. If you had a race, challenge, or public stunt coming up, would you actually set up a campaign for it? If not, what's stopping you? Would love to know what you guys think 😄

    @iamdemetrius_ · Marketing & growth

  5. 0346

    A B2B SaaS grew users with a simple reel format

    I went from 0 to 8,241 users for my B2B SaaS in 50 days. No ads. No content agency. No editor. Just one Reel format, posted twice a day. Got 5.6M views. My best Reel hit 1M. The crazy part? The system is stupidly simple 👇 x.com/i/article/2103…

    @UmerShips · Marketing & growth

  6. 0330

    Buildside: a platform for founders to build in public

    I joined Buildside as a founder exactly 2 months ago. Of course I was the only user on the platform. Then i built it in public and grew it to 299 users today ! #letsgoo !!!

    @uriel_builds · Marketing & growth

  7. 0313

    @hellyeah_ai: fixes ad measurement before it moves spend

    Yesterday our co-founder Jay Ma (@Doudoujay) asked a room of founders: has a post or a launch ever gotten you more attention than customers? Every hand went up. Then he asked them to keep it up if they could put a number on what that attention did to revenue. Most of the hands came down. We know the feeling. We were building @finalroundai before @hellyeah_ai, and it got to $1M ARR on viral alone. One post did 83 million views. Then we went after $10M and kept getting the views without the revenue. You can't schedule a viral post or buy another one. So we put paid next to it and scored every channel on what @stripe collected. $15M ARR in 12 months. 4.2x blended ROAS. @hellyeah_ai came out of that. We were customer zero, then other founders asked us to run the same playbook on their accounts. The first thing we find is broken measurement: 👉 One campaign we audited reported 2,757% ROAS on the platform. Stripe, net of refunds, said 48%. Same campaign. 👉 A client's dashboard counted 16 sales last month. Their database held 3. 👉 A streaming client paid $300 a sale bidding on purchases. 90% of their payers hit 12 streams on day one, so we moved the bid to that event and paid $80. We fix the data before anyone touches a bid. We got tired of doing this by hand on every account, so we built it into a product. The agent runs the audit and the budget moves, and it asks you before it spends. Google Ads today, more platforms after. Jay got into it with @unifygtm (@DurshtE ), @shanda_group (@bei_zhang01) and Press Club (@kwangaroo) afterward about GTM and which users are worth chasing in the first place. All three of us sell to founders who need customers to show up.

    @hellyeah_ai · Marketing & growth

  8. 0301

    Dice: finds articles where your brand should be mentioned

    3 years, 20+ failed projects… and finally one that’s growing I could have stopped in 2023 or 2024 after many failures, but I kept building. I know indie makers who managed to become successful very quickly, but in 90% of cases it does not happen fast. From my experience (and from talking to many other indie makers) I’ve learned that 3 years is about the time it takes for most indie makers to start earning enough to work on their projects full time. I’m still building new products despite already having profitable ones. My latest project, [**Dice**](https://dicee.app/) \- it finds the exact articles your brand should be mentioned in and gets you featured there and get recommended by AI. It has already brought in thousands in revenue and is growing faster than I expected. But none of this would have happened if I hadn’t started building and launching projects one after another back in 2023. The main lesson: Consistency beats luck. Keep shipping, keep learning.

    u/Leather-Buy-6487 · Marketing & growth